Investing in Tokenization: The DADS Portfolio Perspective

Tokenization has been discussed as a coming transformation in financial infrastructure for the better part of a decade, generally without much to show for it beyond pilots and white papers. That has begun to change. Over the past eighteen months, the world’s largest asset manager, both major global card networks, and a growing group of publicly traded financial and fintech companies have moved tokenized products from experimentation into operating scale. Several of these companies are current holdings in the Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS), giving the fund direct, if often overlooked, exposure to this shift.

Defining the Term

Tokenization refers to the representation of an asset’s ownership as a digital token recorded on a blockchain, rather than as an entry in a conventional ledger maintained by a transfer agent, custodian, or clearinghouse.[1] Assets that have been tokenized to date include Treasury bills, money-market fund shares, consumer and commercial loans, publicly traded equity, and bank deposits. The underlying appeal, for the institutions adopting it, is largely operational: tokenized instruments can settle faster than traditional securities, trade outside normal market hours, and transfer between parties with fewer intermediary steps.

This is a useful point for readers to hold onto. Tokenization’s early adopters have not primarily been speculative crypto participants, but established financial institutions such as asset managers, payment networks and regulated banks that are evaluating the technology for its potential operational benefits.

Three Developments Behind the Current Pace of Adoption

A combination of regulatory and market developments appears to explain why tokenization has moved faster in 2025 and 2026 than in prior years.

Regulatory clarity has been a meaningful factor. The GENIUS Act, passed in 2025, established a federal framework for dollar-backed stablecoins, giving bank compliance and risk functions a legal basis for treating fully reserved tokens as legitimate settlement instruments.[2] In August 2026, the SEC issued a no-action letter permitting Franklin Templeton’s conventional mutual funds and ETFs to hold shares of its tokenized BENJI fund for cash management and as collateral, a first for tokenized assets inside traditional fund structures.[3]

Adoption has also reached a scale that is difficult to characterize as experimental. BlackRock’s tokenized Treasury fund, BUIDL, surpassed $5 billion in assets under management in July 2026 across six public blockchains.[4] Franklin Templeton’s BENJI platform now operates on eight.[5] Both funds have grown steadily rather than plateaued after launch, which is generally read as a signal of institutional rather than purely speculative demand.

Market-sizing estimates have also been revised upward repeatedly. Galaxy Digital’s research puts the current tokenized real-world-asset market at roughly $33 billion, with a base case projection of $1.9 trillion by 2030; other estimates from McKinsey and Standard Chartered run as high as $3 trillion over the same period.[6] Separately, filings from Figure Technology cite external forecasts placing the addressable tokenization market at $16 trillion and the stablecoin market near $5 trillion by 2030.[7] These projections vary considerably in methodology, but the direction of the estimates has been consistently upward rather than downward.

Tokenization Activity within the DADS Portfolio

Several companies currently held (as of 9/16/26) in DADS are direct participants in the tokenization economy, spanning lending, capital markets, payments, and asset management.

Figure Technology Solutions. Figure operates a blockchain-based lending marketplace built on the Provenance Blockchain and has originated more than $22 billion in on-chain loans, beginning with home equity lines of credit and expanding into auto loans through a 2026 partnership with Agora Data.[8] The company also issues $YLDS, an SEC-registered, yield-bearing stablecoin structured as a tokenized money-market instrument, and reports having completed the first fully on-chain equity trade.[9] Management has identified tokenization and stablecoins as primary growth areas in investor communications.[10]

Galaxy Digital Holdings. In 2025, Galaxy partnered with transfer agent Superstate to tokenize its own Nasdaq-listed shares, which the companies describe as the first instance of a public company tokenizing SEC-registered equity directly on a major blockchain, with legal ownership recorded on-chain rather than through a synthetic wrapper.¹¹ Galaxy’s research division has also become a frequently cited source for tokenized-market sizing estimates.[13]

Robinhood Markets. Robinhood introduced tokenized U.S. stock and ETF trading for European customers in 2025 alongside Robinhood Chain, a Layer-2 blockchain built to support tokenization of real-world assets.¹³ By mid-2026, Robinhood Chain had reached mainnet*, and tokenized stock trading had expanded to more than 120 countries.[14]

Franklin Templeton, held through its corporate bonds in the fund, operates the BENJI platform underlying the Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund, the first U.S.-registered mutual fund to use a public blockchain as its official system of record.[15] Following the SEC’s 2026 no-action relief, BENJI is positioned to function as a component within conventional ETF and mutual fund structures rather than only as a standalone product.[16]

BlackRock, also held through corporate debt, issues BUIDL, the largest tokenized U.S. Treasury fund in the market, administered with Securitize and now available across six blockchains with more than $5 billion in assets.[17]

Visa has extended stablecoin settlement to nine blockchains, reaching an annualized settlement run rate of approximately $7 billion in early 2026, and is separately developing a tokenized-deposit layer intended to let banks convert traditional deposits into programmable, always-on digital money.[18]

Mastercard has pursued a comparable strategy through its Multi-Token Network and its 2026 acquisition of stablecoin infrastructure provider BVNK, valued at up to $1.8 billion, expanding its on-chain settlement capability for bank and payment-institution clients.[19]

Customers Bancorp, through its Customers Bank subsidiary, was an early entrant in bank-issued tokenized payments. Its CBIT token, built on the TassatPay platform, tokenizes commercial dollar deposits to allow continuous B2B settlement; the product attracted more than $1.5 billion in deposits shortly after its 2021 launch.[20]

These holdings span multiple layers of the financial ecosystem, from tokenization infrastructure and consumer and commercial lending to capital markets, payment settlement and traditional asset management. Together, they aim to provide exposure across the value chain rather than concentrating on any single approach.

From Market Evolution to Investment Opportunity

One lesson from earlier technology-driven shifts, from cloud computing to mobile payments, is that early leadership does not always determine the eventual winners. Tokenization may be following a similar path. Banks, asset managers, payment networks and blockchain-native lenders are developing competing and sometimes complementary approaches, with no clear consensus yet on which platforms or standards will ultimately prevail.

In an environment where the leaders are still being determined, breadth may be an advantage. DADS seeks to provide exposure across multiple layers of the emerging tokenization ecosystem, potentially allowing investors to participate in the broader opportunity without relying on any single company, platform or technology to define its future.

Holdings subject to change. To view holdings, click here.

Sources

    1. Definition consistent with usage across cited sources below; see also Galaxy Digital Inc., Prospectus (Registration Statement), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, accessed August 2026.
    2. Transak, “Visa and Mastercard Stablecoin Settlement: What It Means for Payments,” June 22, 2026.
    3. BigGo Finance, “SEC Clears Path for Franklin Templeton Funds to Hold Tokenized BENJI Shares,” August 2026.
    4. CryptoxInsights, “BlackRock’s BUIDL Fund Crosses $5 Billion in Tokenised Treasuries,” July 17, 2026.
    5. Eco.com Support, “BENJI Deep Dive 2026: Franklin Templeton’s Tokenized Money Market,” 2026.
    6. FinancialContent, “Galaxy Digital Foresees $1.9 Trillion Tokenized Funds Market by 2030, Igniting a New Era for Finance,” October 7, 2025.
    7. PYMNTS.com, “Figure Technology Targets $2T Consumer Lending Market With Blockchain and AI,” September 4, 2025.
    8. Crowdfund Insider, “Figure Technology Solutions Expands RWA Tokenization With Auto Loans On Hastra Platform,” April 15, 2026.
    9. Barchart, “Figure to Participate in Fireside Chat Hosted by Goldman Sachs,” October 22, 2025.
    10. Architect Partners, “Figure Technology Solutions to Merge with Figure Markets,” 2025.
    11. PR Newswire, “Galaxy and Superstate Launch GLXY Tokenized Public Shares on Solana,” September 3, 2025.
    12. FinancialContent, “Galaxy Digital Foresees $1.9 Trillion Tokenized Funds Market by 2030,” October 7, 2025.
    13. Robinhood, “Robinhood Launches Stock Tokens, Reveals Layer 2 Blockchain, and Expands Crypto Suite in EU and US with Perpetual Futures and Staking,” June 30, 2025.
    14. TechTimes, “Robinhood Chain Goes Live With Tokenized Stocks and a Key Ownership Caveat,” July 3, 2026.
    15. Eco.com Support, “BENJI Deep Dive 2026: Franklin Templeton’s Tokenized Money Market,” 2026.
    16. BigGo Finance, “SEC Clears Path for Franklin Templeton Funds to Hold Tokenized BENJI Shares,” August 2026.
    17. CryptoxInsights, “BlackRock’s BUIDL Fund Crosses $5 Billion in Tokenised Treasuries,” July 17, 2026.
    18. Visa, “Visa Announces New AI, Stablecoin and Token Innovations to Power Intelligent, Programmable Commerce at Visa Payments Forum,” June 10, 2026; CoinDesk, “Visa (V) Expands Stablecoin Settlement Network as Volume Hits $7 Billion Run Rate,” April 29, 2026.
    19. Mastercard, “Mastercard to Acquire BVNK to Connect On-Chain Payments and Fiat Rails,” March 17, 2026; CoinDesk, “Mastercard Expands Onchain Settlement in Bet on Stablecoins and Always-On Finance,” June 3, 2026.
    20. Tassat, “Customers Bank and Tassat Launch Blockchain-Enabled Instant Payments on TassatPay,” October 18, 2021; U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Customers Bancorp, Inc., Form 8-K (Q3 2021 Press Release).

The Fund does not invest directly in digital assets; however, it will be subject to the risks associated with digital assets by virtue of this investment. The fund is subject to significant risks that are not typically present in other investments, including possible loss of principal.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. For a prospectus or summary prospectus with this and other information about the Fund, please call 866-379-6199 or visit our website at www.DADSETF.com. Read the prospectus or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

As used herein, Digital Asset Debt Securities, or DAD Securities, means debt securities of issuers that are directly involved in digital asset-related activities, such as mining digital assets, holding digital assets in their corporate treasury or government treasury, and/or working on platforms to facilitate payment with, or the transfer of, digital assets.

Bitcoin & Digital Assets Risk. While the Fund will not directly invest in digital assets, it will be subject to the risks associated with bitcoin by virtue of its investments in DAD Securities that hold bitcoin or other digital assets. Investing in digital assets exposes investors to significant risks that are not typically present in other investments. These risks include the uncertainty surrounding new technology, limited evaluation due to bitcoin’s short trading history, and the potential decline in adoption and value over the long term. The extreme volatility of the price of bitcoin and other digital assets is also a risk factor.

Fixed Income Securities Risk. The prices of fixed income securities respond to economic developments, particularly interest rate changes, as well as to changes in an issuer’s credit rating or market perceptions about the creditworthiness of an issuer. In general, the market price of fixed income securities with longer maturities will increase or decrease more in response to changes in interest rates than shorter-term securities. Changes in government intervention may have adverse effects on investments, volatility, and illiquidity in debt markets. These changes could cause the Fund’s net asset value to fluctuate or make it more difficult for the Fund to accurately value its securities.

Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments, such as futures contracts, options and swaps, that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, or funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. The Fund’s investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in securities or other ordinary investments, including risk related to the market, imperfect correlation with underlying investments or the Fund’s other portfolio holdings, higher price volatility, lack of availability, counterparty risk, liquidity, valuation, and legal restrictions. The use of derivatives is a highly specialized activity that involves investment techniques and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The use of derivatives may result in larger losses or smaller gains than directly investing in securities. When the Fund uses derivatives, there may be imperfect correlation between the value of the underlying instrument and the derivative, which may prevent the Fund from achieving its investment objective.

Convertible Securities Risk. The Fund will invest in convertible securities of companies which are preferred stocks or bonds that pay a fixed dividend or interest payment and are convertible into common stock or other equity interests at a specified price or conversion ratio during a specified period. Convertible securities generally have less potential for gain than common stocks. Also, convertible bonds generally pay less income than non-convertible bonds. Convertible securities tend to provide higher yields than common stocks. However, a higher yield may not protect investors against the risk of loss or adequately mitigate any loss associated with a decline in the price of a convertible security.

Digital Asset Treasury Companies Risk. Issuers whose business is holding bitcoin or other digital assets in their corporate treasury face unique risks as a result of holding digital assets in their corporate treasury. The speculative perception of digital assets may overshadow the fundamentals of such companies, leading to exaggerated price movements based on hype or fear. The value of the Fund’s investments in instruments that provide exposure to bitcoin corporate treasury companies – and therefore the value of an investment in the Fund – could decline significantly and without warning. If you are not prepared to accept significant and unexpected changes in the value of the Fund, you should not invest in the Fund.

Foreign and Emerging Markets Risks. Investments in foreign securities may involve risks such as social and political instability, market illiquidity, exchange-rate fluctuations, a high level of volatility and limited regulation. Investing in emerging markets involves different and greater risks, as these countries are substantially smaller, less liquid, and more volatile than securities markets in more developed markets.

Liquidity. The Fund may lose money or be prevented from earning capital gains if it cannot sell security at the time and price that is most beneficial to the Fund.

High Yield Bonds. High-yield bonds have a higher risk of default or other adverse credit events but have the potential to pay higher earnings over investment grade bonds. The higher risk of default, or the inability of the creditor to repay its debt, is the primary reason for the higher interest rates on high-yield bonds. Examples of other adverse credit events are interest rate risk (when interest rates rise, bond prices fall) and economic risk (the risk associated with downturns in the economy).

Credit Risk. A bond’s credit rating reflects the issuer’s ability to make timely payments of interest or principal—the lower the rating, the higher the risk of default. If the issuer’s financial strength deteriorates, the issuer’s rating may be lowered, and the bond’s value may decline.

Municipal Securities Risk. Funds that invest in municipal obligations of issuers will be affected by economic, political, or other events affecting municipal issuers, which may affect the Fund’s ability to acquire and dispose of municipal obligations at desirable yield and price levels.

Other Investment Companies Risk. The Fund will incur higher and duplicative expenses when it invests in ETFs and other investment companies. By investing in another investment company, the Fund becomes a shareholder of that investment company and bears its proportionate share of the fees and expenses of the other investment company. There is also the risk that the Fund may suffer losses due to the investment practices of the underlying funds as the Fund will be subject to substantially the same risks as those associated with the direct ownership of securities held by such investment companies. ETFs may be less liquid than other investments, and thus their share values are more volatile than the values of the investments they hold.

Mid/Small Capitalization. Investments made in small and mid-capitalization companies may be more volatile and less liquid than large company stocks due to limited resources or product lines and greater sensitivity to adverse economic conditions.

New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized, giving prospective investors a limited track record on which to base their investment decision.

New Sub-Adviser Risk. Although the Sub-Adviser’s principals and the Fund’s portfolio managers have experience managing investments in the past, the Sub-Adviser has no experience managing investments for an ETF, which may limit the Sub-Adviser’s effectiveness.

Distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC.

Privacy Policy